Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) vs QwQ-32B
Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) and QwQ-32B are closely matched at 20.6 and 14.8 on the LLM Stats Score.
Mistral AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) and QwQ-32B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 20.6 and 14.8.
In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512)
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
Choose QwQ-32B
- you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
4 reported for Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) · 7 for QwQ-32B
Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while QwQ-32B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
QwQ-32B has 18.5B more parameters than Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512), making it 132.1% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) specifies input context (262,100 tokens). Only Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) specifies output context (262,100 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.
Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512)
QwQ-32B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.
Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) is 9 months newer than QwQ-32B.
Dec 4, 2025
9 months ago
9mo newerMar 5, 2025
1.5 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512)'s cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512)'s cutoff date.
—
Nov 2024
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) vs QwQ-32B.
Related comparisons
More Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) comparisons
- Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) vs GPT-6 Astra
- Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
- Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) vs Muse Spark 1.3