Muse Glimmer-30B vs Parse
Comparing Muse Glimmer-30B and Parse across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Meta · Cohere · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Muse Glimmer-30B and Parse trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.
Muse Glimmer-30B also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Muse Glimmer-30B
- you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Parse
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
25 reported for Muse Glimmer-30B · 1 for Parse
Muse Glimmer-30B and Parsedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Muse Glimmer-30B has 27.3B more parameters than Parse, making it 1187.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Muse Glimmer-30B accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Parse's 8,192 tokens. Only Muse Glimmer-30B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Muse Glimmer-30B and Parse support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Muse Glimmer-30B
Parse
License
Usage and distribution terms
Muse Glimmer-30B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Parse uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10, while Parse was released on 2026-08-27.
Parse is 1 month newer than Muse Glimmer-30B.
Aug 10, 2026
1 months ago
Aug 27, 2026
3 weeks ago
2w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Muse Glimmer-30B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-04, while Parse's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Muse Glimmer-30B's training data extends to 2026-01-04, but cannot make a direct comparison without Parse's cutoff date.
Jan 2026
—
Provider Availability
Muse Glimmer-30B is available from DeepInfra. Parse is available from Azure, Cohere.
Muse Glimmer-30B
Parse
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Muse Glimmer-30B and Parse side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Muse Glimmer-30B vs Parse.