Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) vs Parse
Comparing Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) and Parse across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
NVIDIA · Cohere · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) and Parse trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Parse
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
15 reported for Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) · 1 for Parse
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) and Parsedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has 29.7B more parameters than Parse, making it 1291.3% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Parse's 8,192 tokens. Only Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) specifies output context (262,144 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Parse supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) does not.
Parse can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Parse
License
Usage and distribution terms
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is licensed under NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement , while Parse uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15, while Parse was released on 2026-08-27.
Parse is 9 months newer than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).
Dec 15, 2025
9 months ago
Aug 27, 2026
3 weeks ago
8mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-11-28, while Parse's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s training data extends to 2025-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Parse's cutoff date.
Nov 2025
—
Provider Availability
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is available from DeepInfra. Parse is available from Azure, Cohere.
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Parse
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) and Parse side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) vs Parse.