Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads the LLM Stats Score 35.0 to 2.5. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is 6.4x cheaper per token.
NVIDIA · Microsoft · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 35.0 to 2.5, ranking #108 overall.
On price, Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is roughly 6.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
- overall performance matters — it scores 35.0 and ranks #108 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
- cost matters — it's about 6.4x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
19 reported for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) · 15 for Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Phi-4-multimodal-instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($0.20/1M tokens) is 4.0x more expensive than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct ($0.05/1M tokens).
For output processing, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($1.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct ($0.10/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is more expensive than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) has 114.4B more parameters than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct, making it 2042.9% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Phi-4-multimodal-instruct's 128,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while Phi-4-multimodal-instruct uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15, while Phi-4-multimodal-instruct was released on 2025-02-01.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 21 months newer than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct.
Oct 15, 2026
5 days ago
1.7yr newerFeb 1, 2025
1.7 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Phi-4-multimodal-instruct's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s cutoff date.
—
Jun 2024
Provider Availability
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is available from DeepInfra.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Phi-4-multimodal-instruct.
Related comparisons
More Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Muse Spark Open
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Muse Wonder
More Phi-4-multimodal-instruct comparisons
- Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs Muse Spark Open
- Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs Muse Wonder