Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads the LLM Stats Score 35.0 to 11.8. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 1.1x cheaper per token.
NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 35.0 to 11.8, ranking #108 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
- overall performance matters — it scores 35.0 and ranks #108 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
19 reported for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) · 14 for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($0.20/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.35/1M tokens).
For output processing, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($1.00/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.40/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) has 47.3B more parameters than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct, making it 65.1% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does not.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct uses Qwen.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Qwen
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 25 months newer than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
Oct 15, 2026
5 days ago
2.1yr newerSep 19, 2024
2.1 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
Related comparisons
More Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Muse Spark Open
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Muse Wonder