The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 45.2 to 35.0. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 4.7x cheaper per token.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.7 Max leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.2 to 35.0, ranking #42 overall.

In the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.7 Max wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is roughly 4.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3.7 Max also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

  • cost matters — it's about 4.7x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3.7 Max

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.2 and ranks #42 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 8 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
NVIDIA
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
35.0
#108
45.2
#42
Reasoning
36.2
#94
46.0
#32
Coding
21.0
#108
35.0
#31
Agents
16.5
#99
28.6
#53
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 8
8 of 8
Input price
$0.20 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
$3.75 / M
Context window
262,144
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Qwen3.7 Max
Math
28.1#101
42.9#4
Vision
20.3#86
25.5#61
Tool use
11.0#133
26.6#31
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) · 42 for Qwen3.7 Max

8 shared

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.7 Max is better at 8 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, IFBench, LiveCodeBench v6, SciCode, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified).

Qwen3.7 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs less

For input processing, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($0.20/1M tokens) is 6.3x cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($1.00/1M tokens) is 3.8x cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.7 Max is more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.7 Max accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Qwen3.7 Max is limited to 65,536 tokens.

NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3.7 Max does not.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while Qwen3.7 Max uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Qwen3.7 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15, while Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 5 months newer than Qwen3.7 Max.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Oct 15, 2026

2 days ago

4mo newer
Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra. Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, DeepInfra, Together.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

Qwen3.7 Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Qwen3.7 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7 Max
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Qwen3.7 Max.

Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 45.2 to 35.0. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) compare to Qwen3.7 Max in benchmarks?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) scores GPQA: 89.5%, LiveCodeBench v6: 88.2%, CharXiv-R: 80.8%, MathVision: 78.2%, BrowseComp: 78.0%. Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%.

Is Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 6.3x cheaper for input tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs $0.20/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Qwen3.7 Max?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Qwen3.7 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (35.0 vs 45.2), context window (262K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.20 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (OpenMDW License v1.1 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Qwen3.7 Max?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons