The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Seed 2.0 Pro

Seed 2.0 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 39.3 to 35.0. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 2.8x cheaper per token.

NVIDIA · ByteDance · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Seed 2.0 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 39.3 to 35.0, ranking #73 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is roughly 2.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 2.8x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Seed 2.0 Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 39.3 and ranks #73 on LLM Stats

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
NVIDIA
Seed 2.0 Pro
ByteDance
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
35.0
#108
39.3
#73
Reasoning
36.2
#94
38.9
#74
Coding
21.0
#108
22.1
#99
Agents
16.5
#99
17.0
#96
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
$0.20 / M
$0.50 / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
$3.00 / M
Context window
262,144
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Seed 2.0 Pro
Math
28.1#101
32.3#65
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) · 6 for Seed 2.0 Pro

4 shared

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) outperforms in 3 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, LiveCodeBench v6), while Seed 2.0 Pro is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-Bench Verified).

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs less

For input processing, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($0.20/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Seed 2.0 Pro ($0.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($1.00/1M tokens) is 3.0x cheaper than Seed 2.0 Pro ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Seed 2.0 Pro is more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
ByteDance
Seed 2.0 Pro
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Seed 2.0 Pro's 256,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Seed 2.0 Pro is limited to 131,072 tokens.

NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
ByteDance
Seed 2.0 Pro
Input256,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Seed 2.0 Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Seed 2.0 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while Seed 2.0 Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Seed 2.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15, while Seed 2.0 Pro was released on 2026-02-14.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 8 months newer than Seed 2.0 Pro.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

8mo newer
Seed 2.0 Pro

Feb 14, 2026

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Seed 2.0 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-01-01, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Seed 2.0 Pro's training data extends to 2024-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s cutoff date.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

—

Seed 2.0 Pro

Jan 2024

Provider Availability

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra. Seed 2.0 Pro is available from DeepInfra.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

Seed 2.0 Pro

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Seed 2.0 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
✓ Preferred
Seed 2.0 Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Seed 2.0 Pro.

Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) or Seed 2.0 Pro?

Seed 2.0 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 39.3 to 35.0. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA and Seed 2.0 Pro is made by ByteDance. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) compare to Seed 2.0 Pro in benchmarks?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) scores GPQA: 89.5%, LiveCodeBench v6: 88.2%, CharXiv-R: 80.8%, MathVision: 78.2%, BrowseComp: 78.0%. Seed 2.0 Pro scores AIME 2025: 98.3%, AIME 2026: 94.2%, GPQA: 88.9%, LiveCodeBench v6: 87.8%, BrowseComp: 77.3%.

Is Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) cheaper than Seed 2.0 Pro?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs $0.20/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra. Seed 2.0 Pro costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Seed 2.0 Pro?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens and Seed 2.0 Pro supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Seed 2.0 Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (35.0 vs 39.3), context window (262K vs 256K), input pricing ($0.20 vs $0.50/M), licensing (OpenMDW License v1.1 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Seed 2.0 Pro?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA and Seed 2.0 Pro is developed by ByteDance.

Related comparisons