Model Comparison

o1-preview vs Qwen3 30B A3BWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 30B A3B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Qwen3 30B A3B is 175.0x cheaper per token.

Verdict: o1-preview vs Qwen3 30B A3B — which is better?

o1-preview (by OpenAI) and Qwen3 30B A3B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

o1-preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, LiveBench). Qwen3 30B A3B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3 30B A3B is roughly 175.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose o1-preview if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output

Choose Qwen3 30B A3B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 175.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

o1-preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, LiveBench).

Qwen3 30B A3B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

For input processing, o1-preview ($15.00/1M tokens) is 150.0x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, o1-preview ($60.00/1M tokens) is 200.0x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o1-preview is more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o1-preview
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while o1-preview is limited to 32,768 tokens.

OpenAI
o1-preview
Input128,000 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

o1-preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 30B A3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o1-preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1-preview was released on 2024-09-12, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 30B A3B is 8 months newer than o1-preview.

o1-preview

Sep 12, 2024

1.7 years ago

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

1.1 years ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

o1-preview is available from OpenAI, Azure. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.

o1-preview

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $16.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $66.00/1M

Qwen3 30B A3B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Higher GPQA score (73.3% vs 65.8%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 30B A3B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2024 score (80.4% vs 42.0%)
Higher LiveBench score (74.3% vs 52.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o1-preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B

FAQ

Common questions about o1-preview vs Qwen3 30B A3B.

Which is better, o1-preview or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. o1-preview is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does o1-preview compare to Qwen3 30B A3B in benchmarks?

o1-preview scores MGSM: 90.8%, MMLU: 90.8%, MATH: 85.5%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveBench: 52.3%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.

Is o1-preview cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B is 150.0x cheaper for input tokens. o1-preview costs $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output via openai. Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for o1-preview and Qwen3 30B A3B?

o1-preview supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o1-preview and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Key differences include input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.10/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o1-preview and Qwen3 30B A3B?

o1-preview is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons