The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.1 to 4.7.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 235B A22B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.1 to 4.7, ranking #255 overall.

In the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 235B A22B wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 235B A22B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.1 and ranks #255 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 8 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
4.7
#324
15.1
#255
0.9
#338
15.8
#243
1.0
#260
12.1
#169
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 8
8 of 8
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Context window
—
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Qwen3 235B A22B
5.0#286
20.9#163
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

45 reported for Qwen2.5-Omni-7B · 23 for Qwen3 235B A22B

8 shared

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 235B A22B is better at 8 benchmarks (GPQA, GSM8k, LiveBench, MATH, MBPP, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux, MultiPL-E).

Qwen3 235B A22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

228.0B diff

Qwen3 235B A22B has 228.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B, making it 3257.1% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
7.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
235.0Bparameters
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
235.0B
Qwen3 235B A22B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 235B A22B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen3 235B A22B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 235B A22B does not.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 235B A22B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27, while Qwen3 235B A22B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 235B A22B is 1 month newer than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.6 years ago

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apr 29, 2025

1.5 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2.5-Omni-7B and Qwen3 235B A22B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 235B A22B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5-Omni-7B vs Qwen3 235B A22B.

Which is better, Qwen2.5-Omni-7B or Qwen3 235B A22B?

Qwen3 235B A22B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.1 to 4.7. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 235B A22B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen2.5-Omni-7B compare to Qwen3 235B A22B in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%. Qwen3 235B A22B scores Arena Hard: 95.6%, GSM8k: 94.4%, BBH: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.8%, MMLU-Redux: 87.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen2.5-Omni-7B and Qwen3 235B A22B?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5-Omni-7B and Qwen3 235B A22B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (4.7 vs 15.1), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.