Model Comparison

Qwen3.6-27B vs MAI-Code-1-FlashWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3.6-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Qwen3.6-27B vs MAI-Code-1-Flash — which is better?

Qwen3.6-27B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and MAI-Code-1-Flash (by Microsoft) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen3.6-27B outperforms in 7 benchmarks (AIME 2026, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MAI-Code-1-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks. Qwen3.6-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Qwen3.6-27B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 7 of 7 shared benchmarks
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose MAI-Code-1-Flash if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Qwen3.6-27B outperforms in 7 benchmarks (AIME 2026, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MAI-Code-1-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Qwen3.6-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.6-27B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.6-27B specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B
Input262,144 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.6-27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas MAI-Code-1-Flash does not.

Qwen3.6-27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3.6-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3.6-27B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MAI-Code-1-Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3.6-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.6-27B was released on 2026-04-21, while MAI-Code-1-Flash was released on 2026-06-02.

MAI-Code-1-Flash is 1 month newer than Qwen3.6-27B.

Qwen3.6-27B

Apr 21, 2026

2 months ago

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Jun 2, 2026

1 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.6-27B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2026 score (94.1% vs 92.5%)
Higher GPQA score (87.8% vs 84.6%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (24.0% vs 18.0%)
Higher SWE-bench Multilingual score (71.3% vs 65.5%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (53.5% vs 51.2%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (77.2% vs 71.6%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (59.3% vs 54.8%)
Microsoft

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3.6-27B and MAI-Code-1-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3.6-27B
✓ Preferred
MAI-Code-1-Flash
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-27B
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1-Flash

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.6-27B vs MAI-Code-1-Flash.

Which is better, Qwen3.6-27B or MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Qwen3.6-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.6-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and MAI-Code-1-Flash is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3.6-27B compare to MAI-Code-1-Flash in benchmarks?

Qwen3.6-27B scores CountBench: 97.8%, VLMsAreBlind: 97.0%, V*: 94.7%, AIME 2026: 94.1%, HMMT 2025: 93.8%. MAI-Code-1-Flash scores AIME 2026: 92.5%, GPQA: 84.6%, IFBench: 75.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 71.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 71.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.6-27B and MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Qwen3.6-27B supports 262K tokens and MAI-Code-1-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3.6-27B and MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Qwen3.6-27B and MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Qwen3.6-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and MAI-Code-1-Flash is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons