Model Comparison

Qwen3.7 Max vs MiMo-V2-ProWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3.7 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Pro is 1.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Qwen3.7 Max vs MiMo-V2-Pro — which is better?

Qwen3.7 Max (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and MiMo-V2-Pro (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen3.7 Max outperforms in 4 benchmarks (Claw-Eval, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 1 benchmark (GDPval-AA). Qwen3.7 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, MiMo-V2-Pro is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Qwen3.7 Max if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 5 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026

Choose MiMo-V2-Pro if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Qwen3.7 Max outperforms in 4 benchmarks (Claw-Eval, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 1 benchmark (GDPval-AA).

Qwen3.7 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Pro costs less

For input processing, Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro ($1.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.7 Max is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerNovita
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Max can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Pro is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Qwen3.7 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19, while MiMo-V2-Pro was released on 2026-03-18.

Qwen3.7 Max is 2 months newer than MiMo-V2-Pro.

Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

1 months ago

2mo newer
MiMo-V2-Pro

Mar 18, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, Together. MiMo-V2-Pro is available from Xiaomi.

Qwen3.7 Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M

MiMo-V2-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.7 Max

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher Claw-Eval score (65.2% vs 61.5%)
Higher SWE-bench Multilingual score (78.3% vs 71.7%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.4% vs 78.0%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (69.7% vs 57.1%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GDPval-AA score (47.5% vs 43.6%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3.7 Max and MiMo-V2-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3.7 Max
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2-Pro
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.7 Max vs MiMo-V2-Pro.

Which is better, Qwen3.7 Max or MiMo-V2-Pro?

Qwen3.7 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and MiMo-V2-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3.7 Max compare to MiMo-V2-Pro in benchmarks?

Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%. MiMo-V2-Pro scores Tau2 Telecom: 96.8%, DeepSearchQA: 86.7%, PinchBench: 81.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 78.0%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 71.7%.

Is Qwen3.7 Max cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is 1.3x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output via novita. MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1.00/M input and $3.00/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.7 Max and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3.7 Max and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Key differences include input pricing ($1.25 vs $1.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Qwen3.7 Max and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and MiMo-V2-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.