Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.7-Plus
Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.7-Plus are closely matched at 45.4 and 42.7 on the LLM Stats Score. Qwen3.7-Plus is 3.3x cheaper per token.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.7-Plus are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 45.4 and 42.7.
In the 35 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.7 Max wins 31; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Qwen3.7-Plus is roughly 3.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Qwen3.7 Max
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 31 of 35 exact shared results
Choose Qwen3.7-Plus
- cost matters — it's about 3.3x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
1 more shared indexes
Individual benchmarks
42 reported for Qwen3.7 Max · 70 for Qwen3.7-Plus
Qwen3.7 Max outperforms in 31 benchmarks (BFCL-V4, Claw-Eval, CoWorkBench, CritPT, Finance Agent v2, Global PIQA, GPQA, HMMT Feb 26, Humanity's Last Exam, IMO-AnswerBench, Include, LiveCodeBench v6, MAXIFE, MCP Atlas, MCP-Mark, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-ProX, MMLU-Redux, MMMLU, NL2Repo, NOVA-63, PolyMATH, SciCode, SkillsBench, SpreadSheetBench-v1, SuperGPQA, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, VITA-Bench, WMT24++), while Qwen3.7-Plus is better at 3 benchmarks (IFEval, QwenWorldBench, Terminal-Bench 2.0).
Qwen3.7 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens) is 3.9x more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus ($0.32/1M tokens).
For output processing, Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens) is 2.9x more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus ($1.28/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Qwen3.7 Max is more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 65,536 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Qwen3.7-Plus supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3.7 Max does not.
Qwen3.7-Plus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7-Plus
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19, while Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31.
Qwen3.7-Plus is 0 month newer than Qwen3.7 Max.
May 19, 2026
3 months ago
May 31, 2026
3 months ago
1w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, Together. Qwen3.7-Plus is available from Together, Fireworks.
Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7-Plus
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.7-Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.7-Plus.