The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 28.0.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 28.0, ranking #10 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Atria Dawn Preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Microsoft
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#10
28.0
#136
Reasoning
50.5
#12
27.8
#132
Coding
36.2
#22
19.0
#108
Agents
38.8
#10
11.2
#109
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
—
256,000

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 2 for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

1 shared

Atria Dawn Preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Atria Dawn Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

606.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 606.0B more parameters than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash, making it 439.1% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
138.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
138.0B
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MAI-Code-1.1-Flash specifies input context (256,000 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Atria Dawn Preview does not.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Atria Dawn Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash was released on 2026-08-11.

Atria Dawn Preview is 1 month newer than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Aug 11, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 28.0. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to MAI-Code-1.1-Flash in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash scores SWE-Bench Verified: 72.6%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 62.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 28.0), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons