The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 28.0. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 5.0x cheaper per token.

InclusionAI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 28.0, ranking #44 overall.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 5.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.0 and ranks #44 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 5.0x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Microsoft
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.0
#44
28.0
#136
Reasoning
44.2
#35
27.8
#132
Agents
29.2
#37
11.2
#109
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.06 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
262,144
256,000

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 2 for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and MAI-Code-1.1-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens) is 3.3x cheaper than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens) is 6.7x cheaper than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

14.0B diff

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash has 14.0B more parameters than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin, making it 11.3% larger.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
124.0Bparameters
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
138.0Bparameters
124.0B
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
138.0B
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to MAI-Code-1.1-Flash's 256,000 tokens. Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash was released on 2026-08-11.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 1 month newer than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

2 weeks ago

3w newer
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Aug 11, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is available from GitHub Copilot.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

github-copilot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
✓ Preferred
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 28.0. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.0 Flash Fin compare to MAI-Code-1.1-Flash in benchmarks?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash scores SWE-Bench Verified: 72.6%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 62.9%.

Is Ling 3.0 Flash Fin cheaper than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 3.3x cheaper for input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output via github-copilot.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.0 vs 28.0), context window (262K vs 256K), input pricing ($0.06 vs $0.20/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons