The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched at 44.2 and 44.8 on the LLM Stats Score. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 1.9x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 44.2 and 44.8.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is roughly 1.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.22/M input and $0.66/M output

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 1.9x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
DeepSeek
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
44.2
#52
44.8
#45
Reasoning
40.8
#65
43.6
#50
Coding
33.0
#44
34.0
#37
Agents
30.4
#44
32.0
#38
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.22 / M
$0.14 / M
Output price
$0.66 / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Tool use
22.3#58
26.4#33
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

2 shared

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, Terminal-Bench 2.1).

MiMo-V2.6-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Oct 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp ($0.22/1M tokens) is 1.6x more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp ($0.66/1M tokens) is 2.4x more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Oct 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
Input tokens$0.22
Output tokens$0.66
Best providerDeepSeek
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Only DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp specifies output context (393,216 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Oct 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp was released on 2026-08-21, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 1 month newer than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

Aug 21, 2026

2 months ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

4 weeks ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.66/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.44/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.32/1M

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 44.2 and 44.8. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is made by DeepSeek and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 83.9%, DSBench-Hard: 63.6%, DeepSWE: 59.3%, NL2Repo: 57.7%, ZEROBench: 35.0%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

Is DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 1.6x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp costs $0.22/M input and $0.66/M output via deepseek. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.2 vs 44.8), input pricing ($0.22 vs $0.14/M), licensing (Unknown vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is developed by DeepSeek and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons