The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs QwQ-32B

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 15.0.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 15.0, ranking #45 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.5 and ranks #45 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.5
#45
15.0
#219
Coding
35.6
#24
10.4
#155
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 7 for QwQ-32B

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and QwQ-32Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 18 months newer than QwQ-32B.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1.5yr newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or QwQ-32B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.5 to 15.0. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.5 vs 15.0), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and QwQ-32B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons