The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

GPT-5.2 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 42.8 to 35.0. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 144.4x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-5.2 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.8 to 35.0, ranking #58 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-5.2 Pro wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is roughly 144.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-5.2 Pro also accepts a larger context window (400,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5.2 Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.8 and ranks #58 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 400,000 token context window

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

  • cost matters — it's about 144.4x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.8
#58
35.0
#108
Reasoning
41.4
#60
36.2
#94
Agents
18.0
#90
16.5
#99
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$21.00 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$168.00 / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
400,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
GPT-5.2 Pro
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Math
38.6#24
28.1#101
Vision
23.9#68
20.3#86
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for GPT-5.2 Pro · 19 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

3 shared

GPT-5.2 Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is better at 1 benchmark (BrowseComp).

GPT-5.2 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.2 Pro ($21.00/1M tokens) is 105.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.2 Pro ($168.00/1M tokens) is 168.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.2 Pro is more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro
Input tokens$21.00
Output tokens$168.00
Best providerOpenAI
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.2 Pro accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while GPT-5.2 Pro is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-5.2 Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5.2 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-5.2 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-5.2 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.2 Pro was released on 2025-12-11, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 10 months newer than GPT-5.2 Pro.

GPT-5.2 Pro

Dec 11, 2025

10 months ago

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT-5.2 Pro is available from OpenAI. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra.

GPT-5.2 Pro

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $21.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $168.00/1M

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.2 Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.2 Pro
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.2 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).

Which is better, GPT-5.2 Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

GPT-5.2 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 42.8 to 35.0. GPT-5.2 Pro is made by OpenAI and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5.2 Pro compare to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) in benchmarks?

GPT-5.2 Pro scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT 2025: 100.0%, GPQA: 93.2%, ARC-AGI: 90.5%, BrowseComp: 77.9%. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) scores GPQA: 89.5%, LiveCodeBench v6: 88.2%, CharXiv-R: 80.8%, MathVision: 78.2%, BrowseComp: 78.0%.

Is GPT-5.2 Pro cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 105.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.2 Pro costs $21.00/M input and $168.00/M output via openai. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs $0.20/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.2 Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

GPT-5.2 Pro supports 400K tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.2 Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.8 vs 35.0), context window (400K vs 262K), input pricing ($21.00 vs $0.20/M), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.2 Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

GPT-5.2 Pro is developed by OpenAI and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons