The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-1.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.3 to -2.6.

xAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.3 to -2.6, ranking #39 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-1.5

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.3 and ranks #39 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Grok-1.5
xAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-2.6
#338
43.3
#39
Reasoning
-2.1
#328
44.7
#32
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Grok-1.5
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Finance
4.7#174
36.7#5
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Grok-1.5 · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

Grok-1.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

xAI
Grok-1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Wed Sep 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-1.5 was released on 2024-03-28, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 30 months newer than Grok-1.5.

Grok-1.5

Mar 28, 2024

2.5 years ago

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

6 days ago

2.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-1.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-1.5
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-1.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, Grok-1.5 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.3 to -2.6. Grok-1.5 is made by xAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-1.5 compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

Grok-1.5 scores GSM8k: 90.0%, DocVQA: 85.6%, MMLU: 81.3%, HumanEval: 74.1%, MMMU: 53.6%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-1.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Grok-1.5 supports an unknown number of tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-1.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-2.6 vs 43.3), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-1.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Grok-1.5 is developed by xAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons