The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Muse Spark Open

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Muse Spark Open are closely matched at 42.9 and 45.3 on the LLM Stats Score. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 22.2x cheaper per token.

InclusionAI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Muse Spark Open are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 42.9 and 45.3.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 22.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark Open also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • cost matters — it's about 22.2x cheaper per token

Choose Muse Spark Open

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Muse Spark Open
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.9
#59
45.3
#42
Reasoning
44.7
#44
45.7
#35
Agents
28.6
#54
30.8
#43
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.06 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
$4.25 / M
Context window
262,144
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Muse Spark Open
Tool use
20.7#65
23.3#45
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 17 for Muse Spark Open

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Muse Spark Opendon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens) is 20.8x cheaper than Muse Spark Open ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens) is 23.6x cheaper than Muse Spark Open ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark Open is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

692.0B diff

Muse Spark Open has 692.0B more parameters than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin, making it 558.1% larger.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
124.0Bparameters
Meta
Muse Spark Open
816.0Bparameters
124.0B
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
816.0B
Muse Spark Open

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark Open accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. Muse Spark Open can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is limited to 262,144 tokens.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Spark Open supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.

Muse Spark Open can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark Open

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while Muse Spark Open was released on 2026-10-15.

Muse Spark Open is 1 month newer than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

1 months ago

Muse Spark Open

Oct 15, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra. Muse Spark Open is available from Together.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M

Muse Spark Open

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Muse Spark Open side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark Open
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Muse Spark Open.

Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or Muse Spark Open?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Muse Spark Open are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 42.9 and 45.3. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI and Muse Spark Open is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.0 Flash Fin compare to Muse Spark Open in benchmarks?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%. Muse Spark Open scores MCP Atlas: 89.2%, GPQA: 89.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.4%, BabyVision: 80.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 76.4%.

Is Ling 3.0 Flash Fin cheaper than Muse Spark Open?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 20.8x cheaper for input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra. Muse Spark Open costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Muse Spark Open?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens and Muse Spark Open supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Muse Spark Open?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.9 vs 45.3), context window (262K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.06 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Muse Model License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Muse Spark Open?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI and Muse Spark Open is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons