The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 42.9 to 21.8.

InclusionAI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.9 to 21.8, ranking #59 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.9 and ranks #59 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.9
#59
21.8
#203
Reasoning
44.7
#44
19.6
#216
Agents
28.6
#54
-1.8
#203
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.06 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
262,144
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Tool use
20.7#65
-2.2#206
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

1 shared

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Tau3 Banking), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

120.0B diff

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has 120.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 3000.0% larger.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
124.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
124.0B
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 1 month newer than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

1 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 42.9 to 21.8. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.0 Flash Fin compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.9 vs 21.8), licensing (Unknown vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons