The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 42.9 to 29.6.

InclusionAI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.9 to 29.6, ranking #59 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.9 and ranks #59 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.9
#59
29.6
#146
Reasoning
44.7
#44
28.9
#146
Agents
28.6
#54
11.9
#127
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.06 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
262,144
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Tool use
20.7#65
5.4#169
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

1 shared

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Tau3 Banking), while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

50.0B diff

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has 50.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB), making it 67.6% larger.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
124.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
74.0Bparameters
124.0B
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
74.0B
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 1 month newer than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

1 months ago

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Oct 15, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

—

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

May 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).

Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 42.9 to 29.6. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.0 Flash Fin compare to Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) in benchmarks?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) scores PinchBench: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, BrowseComp: 66.8%, AA-LCR: 64.1%, MCP Atlas: 52.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.9 vs 29.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons