The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Solar Pro 4

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Solar Pro 4 are closely matched at 35.0 and 35.0 on the LLM Stats Score. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 1.3x cheaper per token.

NVIDIA · Upstage · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Solar Pro 4 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 35.0 and 35.0.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Solar Pro 4 also accepts a larger context window (524,288 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 6 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Solar Pro 4

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 524,288 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
NVIDIA
Solar Pro 4
Upstage
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
35.0
#108
35.0
#107
Reasoning
36.2
#94
34.7
#103
Coding
21.0
#108
20.6
#112
Agents
16.5
#99
12.0
#128
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 6
2 of 6
Input price
$0.20 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
262,144
524,288

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Solar Pro 4
Math
28.1#101
32.4#63
Tool use
11.0#133
9.6#149
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) · 9 for Solar Pro 4

6 shared

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) outperforms in 4 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Solar Pro 4 is better at 2 benchmarks (AA-LCR, Tau3 Banking).

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs less

For input processing, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($0.20/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than Solar Pro 4 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($1.00/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than Solar Pro 4 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Solar Pro 4 is more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Upstage
Solar Pro 4
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Solar Pro 4 accepts 524,288 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Solar Pro 4 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Upstage
Solar Pro 4
Input524,288 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Solar Pro 4 does not.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Solar Pro 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while Solar Pro 4 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Solar Pro 4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15, while Solar Pro 4 was released on 2026-08-06.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 2 months newer than Solar Pro 4.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

2mo newer
Solar Pro 4

Aug 6, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra. Solar Pro 4 is available from Upstage.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

Solar Pro 4

upstage logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Solar Pro 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
✓ Preferred
Solar Pro 4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Solar Pro 4.

Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) or Solar Pro 4?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Solar Pro 4 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 35.0 and 35.0. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA and Solar Pro 4 is made by Upstage. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) compare to Solar Pro 4 in benchmarks?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) scores GPQA: 89.5%, LiveCodeBench v6: 88.2%, CharXiv-R: 80.8%, MathVision: 78.2%, BrowseComp: 78.0%. Solar Pro 4 scores AIME 2026: 95.3%, GPQA: 89.0%, LiveCodeBench: 87.8%, MMLU-Pro: 86.3%, AA-LCR: 71.0%.

Is Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) cheaper than Solar Pro 4?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs $0.20/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra. Solar Pro 4 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via upstage.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Solar Pro 4?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens and Solar Pro 4 supports 524K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Solar Pro 4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (35.0 vs 35.0), context window (262K vs 524K), input pricing ($0.20 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (OpenMDW License v1.1 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Solar Pro 4?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA and Solar Pro 4 is developed by Upstage.

Related comparisons