Model Comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)Which is better in 2026?

Gemma 3 4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3 4B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) — which is better?

Gemma 3 4B (by Google) and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 8 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, ECLeKTic, GPQA, HiddenMath, HumanEval, MBPP, MMLU-Pro, WMT24++), while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is better at 2 benchmarks (Global-MMLU-Lite, LiveCodeBench). Gemma 3 4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3 4B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 8 of 10 shared benchmarks

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

10 benchmarks

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 8 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, ECLeKTic, GPQA, HiddenMath, HumanEval, MBPP, MMLU-Pro, WMT24++), while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is better at 2 benchmarks (Global-MMLU-Lite, LiveCodeBench).

Gemma 3 4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.1B diff

Gemma 3 4B has 2.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview), making it 109.4% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
4.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
1.9Bparameters
4.0B
Gemma 3 4B
1.9B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 4B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 4B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Jun 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3 4B and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Gemma.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is 2 months newer than Gemma 3 4B.

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.3 years ago

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.1 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemma 3 4B has more recent training data (up to 2024-08-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) (2024-06-01).

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

2 mo newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Higher BIG-Bench Hard score (72.2% vs 44.3%)
Higher ECLeKTic score (4.6% vs 2.5%)
Higher GPQA score (30.8% vs 24.8%)
Higher HiddenMath score (43.0% vs 27.7%)
Higher HumanEval score (71.3% vs 66.5%)
Higher MBPP score (63.2% vs 56.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (43.6% vs 40.5%)
Higher WMT24++ score (46.8% vs 42.7%)
Google
Higher Global-MMLU-Lite score (59.0% vs 54.5%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (13.2% vs 12.6%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 4B and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 4B
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Which is better, Gemma 3 4B or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Gemma 3 4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 4B is made by Google and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3 4B compare to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 4B and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Related comparisons